Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ameconspiracy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 23:14, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ameconspiracy

No evidence of notability. --W(t) 01:41, 2005 May 29 (UTC)

• Keep. We don't know enough about the subject to know whether or not it's notable yet, and the article is a day old. Let's not eat our young. — Phil Welch 02:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - fanfic? 4 google hits? no article on the convention it parodies? I'm thinking not. -- Jonel 02:38, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. --Sn0wflake 03:50, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. A quick look in Google tells us that it's not notable. Try again when you get ten thousand hits. -- Hoary 04:13, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity fanfic. Megan1967 04:54, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unlike Philwelch, I believe in nipping problems in the bud. --Xcali 05:33, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, how would waiting make this any more notable than it is now? RickK 05:51, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Quale 11:16, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It seems to be losing notability as time passes. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:09, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 06:54, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.