Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambient Weather

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 19:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ambient Weather

A private company. No sales figures, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP. Creator is User:Ambientsw - could they perhaps be related? Written in sufficiently florid terms as to suggest vanispamcruftisement. Just zis Guy you know? 16:45, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Looks like vanity to me. Top 500 list of fastest growing companies? Please. The magazine might need to be AfDed as well. Aplomado ^talk 16:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like WP:VANITY amd WP:SPAM, but I don’t think it’s cruft User:Ambientsw ‘s contribs tell a tale.. See Ed Edelman listed below. :) Dlohcierekim 17:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment Asserts notability w/ Inc. Magazine qoute(the magazine, not the article). :) Dlohcierekim 17:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 22:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 22:44, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.