Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Marie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Feb. 28, '06 [10:21] <freakofnur_xture|talk>

[edit] Amber Marie

non-notable, Playboy online model with no significant other credits Monicasdude 20:06, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. {prod} objection, expanded article adds no significant claim to notability. Monicasdude 20:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete You've got to get a cover or centerfold to be notable...--Isotope23 20:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is the second n-n topless model named Amber today, and this one is less noticeable than the other one. Fan1967 20:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ...uh-oh, look at Category:Playboy Cyber Girls... there's over 150 articles like this! Time for a group nomination, I'd say. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Somebody added entries for every girl who took her top off on Playboy's web site? Oy. Fan1967 14:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Unfortunately, they don't qualify for a group nomination, since a small but nontrivial percentage have minimally notable other credits. Monicasdude 16:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Apparently User:Bubbaspuds has made it his mission to catalog all these models, even if it's the only time they've ever appeared anywhere, which would certainly seem to make them NN. Fan1967 16:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I would say a solid 50 of the "Cyber Girl" models in the category right now have other notable credits to their name, and the thing with these models is that many go on to become Playmates or go into some other form of valid showbiz/entertainment (wrestling, movie actresses, etc...). Cyber Girls are arguably just as popular as Playmates these days and all the Playmates are "allowed" to have their own entry. Maybe it's overkill to do a page for every one, but I think the ones created now should be let be (considering that it will be very hard to justly eliminate all the ones people feel are NN, since some may truly not be NN), and the standard should be set that in the future only those who go on to add more notable credits to their name can be given a seperate entry. Just my thought. DOAsaturn 10:37, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.