Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 00:56, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amber Brooks

Prodded, removed and replaced with speedy tag, re-prodded in error by me. Not a speedy, although claims to notability are tenous. Link to own site with "can be booked at" smells of advertising. Recomend deltion unless greater claims to notability are shown. brenneman^{T}{L} 04:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. James084 04:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Obvious ad for her website Fan1967 05:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as not meeting WP:BIO. Not a speedy as there are claims to notability. Capitalistroadster 05:19, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- DS1953 ^talk 05:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Deleteper nom.pschemp | talk 06:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Yes well - this artice deserved to be busted Delete. VirtualSteve 08:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all. Monicasdude 14:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Capitalistroadster --Ruby 14:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete yuk. I can't believe they made me click that link. Why do people do that to themselves? Guy 22:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete BAH! I clicked on that link too... Gawd... Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK!. 04:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
  • The scary thing is the text that says she's planning additional implants to make them larger. Uggghh. Fan1967 15:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for now. Has potential to become notable in the genre (see Ewa Sonnet) but too early in the game; can always be recreated if she starts making videos or appearing in more magazines. That comment about the additional implants is probably just nonsense since it's unsourced. 23skidoo 15:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually, the comment about the additional implants is from her own website. Also from her website, it appears her main occupation is, uhh, how to put this, personal appointments. Of all the things Wiki is not, you'd have to include ads for personal services. Fan1967 16:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.