Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AmberNet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  10:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AmberNet

Small IRC network. Prod tag removed by creator without explanations. Fails WP:WEB. The google search for ambernet + IRC gives 103 unique hits and most pages seem to be just listings or advertisements. Pascal.Tesson 18:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

  • (after edit conflict) Delete per nom. —Whomp t/c 18:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
mm Let's try again to edit this page and add my comment.
I wonder why the AmberNet page should be deleted if an EFnet, an undernet or an Afternet do can have there page on Wikipedia?
Is this because AmberNet is just a small network? And if so .. wow .. speak about discrimination.
Isn't wikipedia all about getting as much information to visitors? And why I removed the Prod tag? The second after I submitted the basic page you put that comment up. I was still working on the page!! --Alcately 18:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Look, it's nothing personnal and you should not feel attacked by this proposed deletion. Yes Wikipedia is open to a lot of content but it is not an Internet guide. It's not about discrimination against smaller networks, it's about recognizing the encyclopedic value of large ones. Pascal.Tesson 04:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete lacks references from reliable sources, and by the look of the Google results, none are likely to come along anytime soon. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Nothing new to say that hasn't already been. — Nathan (talk) / 21:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. People have heard of EFnet. Fan-1967 21:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.