Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazoness Series

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 01:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amazoness Series, Ancient Gear series, Archfiend series, Black Dragon Series, Gravekeepers Series, Rocket Warrior, Saggi the Dark Clown, Thousand-Eyes Idol

Not notable cards, very possible copyvio. Precedent is already established by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Gi-Oh! card lists and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Gi-Oh! single card articles. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 21:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete all and ask the author to contribute to Yu-Gi-Oh wikicities. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 04:31Z
  • Delete Single cards aren't notable enough for the general Wikipedia, especially without anything other than what's on the card to back it up. -- Grev 19:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Everything short of the Black Dragon Series, which actually is significant and has a large fanfare. It's notable as a counterpart to the Blue-Eyes White Dragon and has a well-developed article in comparison to the other ones. -- Sephiroth BCR (talk)1:20, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep: Most of the choices possess alot of info. Both the Archfiends and the Black Dragon series being the heavyweights of the list.
    • Not really. All Archfiend series does is give you a copyvio text of the card and then gives you "strategy" that actually phrases the card's effect longer than the card does itself. No other information is included in "Strategy" other than redundancy. ' (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 06:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete the whole lot, per Grev. Stifle 14:57, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Single cards? I think not, thanks. And yes I know pre-adolescent boys are obsessed by them; luckily mine are now old enough to have discovered Runescape, which is at least free... Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 20:41, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep all of them, pre-adolscent boys are human too. Especially don't delete the Black Dragon series per Sephiroth. Kappa 15:54, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete for the reasons given above. If "tosh" was a VfD category I'd be citing that too. Demogorgon's Soup-taster 15:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom --Jaranda wat's sup 06:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.