Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amara's law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - Latinus 20:29, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amara's law

No source for who termed this "Amara's Law", too few Google hits for something technology-oriented. Looks like original research. JoaoRicardo^talk 00:43, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep first result: [1] Tom Harrison ^Talk 01:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Tom - PC Mag is reliable --M@thwiz2020 02:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep has citations to literature and is very likely that if it is deleted someone will recreate the article later. It would be better to keep it for now and allow further elaboration when the time is right. Merosonox 09:14, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I have heard of this, and I am not a technology geek. (Oh and google and citation etc) Batmanand 10:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tom Harrison. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 15:50, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Harrison. Arbustoo 21:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Interesting topic. Personally I have different feelings about "PC Mag" but at least serves as a 3rd party source.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.