The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. JIP | Talk 12:24, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Tagged as nn-bio but there is an assertion of notability (in the last-but-one paragraph). That said, it's a pretty tenuous claim, I'm afraid, and even systemic bias does not really persuade me of the encyclopaedic merit of this subject. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 10:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 10:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Arbustoo 09:25, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete per the guy who tagged it as a speedy. Stifle 10:37, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.