Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Rogers (Star Trek)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to True Q. Information cannot be merged due to copyvio. — Deckiller 03:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Amanda Rogers (Star Trek)

Amanda Rogers (Star Trek) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Character appears in a single episode and has no real-world notability beyond those ~45 minutes. Article, which is just plot summary, cites no references beyond the episode itself. I earlier redirected it to that episode ("True Q") but another editor reverted, asserting that AfD would be more appropriate because a redirect essentially deletes all the article's content. --EEMeltonIV 23:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

• Merge to the events to True Q and merge immediate bio to a section in Q (Star Trek). -WarthogDemon 23:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge, in the interests of full disclosure I'm a confirmed Trekkie, but this character simply doesn't deserve her own article. Merge & Redirect per WarthogDemon. Naufana : talk 00:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per WarthogDemon. Character has no independent notability. -Chunky Rice 00:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - This page appears to be a copyvio from [1] and there is no non-copyvio version in its history. I'll take care of the copyvio. "paperwork"; whether it gets axed through AfD or that listing, we will see. --EEMeltonIV 03:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per Warthog. Note: Memory Alpha is a wiki with rights under creative commons, so a copyvio tag may not be relevant in this case. Ohconfucius 08:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC) Ohconfucius 08:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

The specific CC license used by MA is not compatible with the GFDL. MrZaius^talk 04:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete/redirect copyvio doesn't warrant retention, and, after having been blanked by EEMeltonIV, doesn't warrant rewrite. Redirect or delete. MrZaius^talk 04:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.