Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Latona (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to innosense. (I did a brute force merge, please help cleanup) See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Finn (3rd nomination), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danay Ferrer (2nd nomination) - Nabla (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Amanda Latona

Amanda Latona (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

fails WP:MUSIC, non notable. Waste of space. No significant hits. Adam Pirolo (talk) 20:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

• Question Not my field, but an interesting question, if I understand things right. She seems to be no significant recordings, she was a member of a group only during the period before they became important, and the main aspect of notability is being the subject of a NYT article discussing the efforts of her managers to promote her into an important career, which have apparently not succeeded? If a RS writes a major human interest article to demonstrate how thoroughly a person is unimportant, do we include that person? DGG (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Very weak keep based on NYT article.--Fabrictramp (talk) 23:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep based on the NYT article Callelinea (talk) 02:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.