Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvyn BASIC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alvyn BASIC

Non-notable implementation of the BASIC language. Searching for "Alvyn BASIC" gets about 80 hits, mostly from echos of this article. Mikeblas 13:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep (or at the very least merge) while it is not terribly notable when looking at all BASICs it is notable because the language it implements AMOS BASIC which was very notable. It has gotten a good amount of exposure on Amiga related websites and forums for this reason. - DNewhall 19:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 22:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Article does not cite any references other than SourceForge; in particular, it does not cite any sources that speak to its being an important or notable implementation. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Already listed under: List_of_BASIC_dialects_by_platform#Commodore_Amiga along with the 5 other basic intrepreters available for Amiga. There is nothing notable enough about this one variant that justifies an article. --Xrblsnggt 03:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete adequately covered in above list Dlyons493 Talk 13:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 17:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 17:33, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Bucketsofg✐ 23:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.