Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative physics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts in lieu of deletion. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-08 09:45Z

[edit] Alternative physics

Alternative physics (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is essentially a publish the URL of your own revolutionary physics theory page. As wellintended the original creator of the page may be, I don't see how it ever will work out as an encyclopedic article. --Pjacobi 07:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Keep. I like it, and I think it will be of use to curious minds. At least the subject should be included. StAnselm 08:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

• WP:ILIKEIT. MER-C 09:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, OK. StAnselm 10:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete. This is not a suitable topic for an encyclopaedia and it is asking for trouble. If any of the individual 'theories' merit an entry, that should be dealt with individually, and they can be put in the 'pseudoscience' category. 'Alternative physics' is, of course, just a euphemism for 'pseudoscience'. Richard1968 08:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete - a collection of non-notable theories does not become notable by virtue of number of entries. --Haemo 09:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Also a thinly disguised directory of external links. MER-C 09:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per previous comment Duke of Whitstable 11:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. We already have Theory of everything for the serious and List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts for the nutty thinkers, and a honeypot for trolls is not on the wishlist. Kosebamse 13:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Interesting but unecessary, as stated above we already have articles that cover this subject in a better manner. 15:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkyan (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom. RogueNinja 18:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Kosebamse above all. Anville 22:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not represent any real phenomenon in the field of physics or the world. Tulane97 14:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.