Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative Living

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was MERGE to Alternative lifestyle, seems both natural and in line with the discussion following the rewrite. -Splashtalk 18:11, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alternative Living

Appears to be ripped directly from a website. Icarus 07:58, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Per Nom, Plus not even article. ~Linuxerist L / T 08:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - for not really being an article. Wickethewok 08:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - A copy-and-paste job. Burschik 09:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, easy to spot copyvio, this... It's ripped off from the external link mentioned in the page. To admin: don't forget to delete the copyvio image (Image:Veg.JPG) too. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 09:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as a copyvio, as per Kimchi.sg. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 12:36, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but move to to Alternative living with correct capitilisation, and completly rewrite. Article as it stands is copyvio, but as it is an important concept and frequently used term: 15,000,000 google links. Might be worth merging with Alternative lifestyle. --Salix alba (talk) 14:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment now removed copyvio material and replaced with a stub article. --Salix alba (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and Redirect - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 16:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge stub with Alternative lifestyle. Sandstein 17:17, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Nominator changing vote to merge per Sandstein now that article has been totally re-written as a stub. --Icarus 18:34, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Article was rewritten late in the AfD --W.marsh 15:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.