The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, no reliable secondary sources. Davewild 08:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Org. that fails to establish notability Lugnuts 09:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coredesat 04:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -RiverHockey 13:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete. No third party references to back up the significance of this label. WjBscribe 04:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.