Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphabet Supes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alphabet Supes

Alphabet Supes (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Previous AfD for this article in 2005 resulted in "keep". This is a 1-paragraph article on a superhero-group comic book, of which as far as I can tell only one issue was ever produced. Most ghits only seem to be small comic book sales websites and review websites. Author was argued to be notable in previous AfD, though notability is not inherited. I'll argue that this article fails WP:N and see how it goes from there.... AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 19:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. JONATHAN ^{Go green!} 19:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep considering the past AfD was closed as a keep, and because the creator is extremely notable; however I would like to see some third party sources for this article. TonyBallioni 21:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. STORMTRACKER 94 21:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to creator's article and mention in an "other works include..." sentence. The notability of the creator does not impart independent notability onto all of his creations. Otto4711 22:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.   jj137 (Talk) 22:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I do not think it can be rescued. Bearian'sBooties 00:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. —Hiding Talk 11:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect I flagged the notability in June and nothing has been done. I looked into it and it was one issue published in 1999 [1][2] and now available online.[3] It doesn't seem to have made any impact that I'm aware of and there is not much to say about it so I don't think there is any point in a merge (although I might recommend turning this into a redirect to his page) and just add those 3 links as footnotes by the name which should provide everyone as much information as they'll need. (Emperor 17:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.