Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlogiA (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP, nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. Whpq (talk) 18:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AlogiA (band)
Fails to assert notability. Fails WP:MUSIC/WP:BAND because their releases are not on any notable/successful independent labels. ScarianCall me Pat 16:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC) Withdraw - I am withdrawing my nomination as notability has been proven. ScarianCall me Pat 03:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep In fact, they appear to be signed to some rather important Serbian labels, and would indeed pass WP:MUSIC. The dearth of English-language writing on Serbian music should not prevent us from looking at their music as equally legitimate for inclusion. Chubbles (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- Comment - an important label would need to be internationally renowned. If it's an independent label it needs to be well known and have numerous notable acts on it's roster. ScarianCall me Pat 17:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- If the label is important within its own country, that is sufficient; they need not be internationally renowned. Chubbles (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes - but how would we know that they're important within their own country unless evidence is provided? ScarianCall me Pat 17:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- At the very least, The Metal Observer seems to think so. Maybe we should ask WikiProject Serbia for help. Chubbles (talk) 18:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Look at the style of writing in that link. That's not a neutral third party source. It's heavily biased. Find something written for a newspaper or something that is from a respected source. ScarianCall me Pat 18:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's not terribly well written, but The Metal Observer is nonetheless one of the more well-known metal review and news sites. Again, since most of the coverage for the band is in Serbian, it's difficult for me personally (who speaks no Serbian) to find links (or paper sources - often ignored!) I am requesting assistance at WP:SERBIA. Chubbles (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Look at the style of writing in that link. That's not a neutral third party source. It's heavily biased. Find something written for a newspaper or something that is from a respected source. ScarianCall me Pat 18:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- At the very least, The Metal Observer seems to think so. Maybe we should ask WikiProject Serbia for help. Chubbles (talk) 18:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes - but how would we know that they're important within their own country unless evidence is provided? ScarianCall me Pat 17:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- (Re-indent) - Fair enough. I look forward to see what you dig up, friend. ScarianCall me Pat 18:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep in the article their two Serbian-language albums are identified as being released on One Records (Serbia), which according to its article has been around several years and has several blue-linked artists who seem significant in the Serbian music scene. Their English-language release is on Locomotive Music, which also has a roster of apparently significant artists (mostly Spanish). So I'd say they pass criterion #5. Rigadoun (talk) 20:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - it's been established that they meet WP:MUSIC and also nom withdrew.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep per Chubbles. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
