Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Kasic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Allison Kasic
Non-notable student (well, just graduated in 2005); good luck, but not worth an article even by wiki notability standards. Sdedeo (tips) 22:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nonnotable. --Angr (t·c) 22:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Google search just reveals some nn blogs and links to the student newspaper she contributed to. --Pboyd04 22:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete part of a POV crapflood by a fan of some far-right magazine. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 23:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --VT hawkeyetalk to me 23:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as above. -- Op. Deo 00:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -Willmcw 01:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per CSD:A7. Artile is likely to be recreated as it is being linked from three others. -- ReyBrujo 13:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep -- Kasic is engaged in the battle of campus minds that has been going on for years. This wiki elitism only helps prevent accurate documentation of the right wing conspiracy that has been assaulting academic freedom for 20 years. The $20 million that the extreme right is funnelling into campuses can't be accurately understood if not for documenting the key players, and Kasic has been in both roles as an undergraduate and now, after graduating, as part of Morton Blackwell's campus brownshirts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.220.30.48 (talk • contribs)
- Hi anon -- the problem is that Kasic is non-notable. There are a great many reasons why non-notability makes it hard to maintain an article; in particular, it makes it impossible to provide adaquate independent sources to document an article's claims about the subject. Sdedeo (tips) 02:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- delete NN Bio Pete.Hurd 02:11, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.