Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Greenfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. This nomination and the one below are the users first and only contributions to Wikipedia (Mod176 (talk • contribs • count)), and leads me to believe its a bad faith nom and/or possible attack. If any admin thinks I am wrong, you are more than welcome to overturn and delete. SynergeticMaggot 22:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Allen_Greenfield

Vanity Article Mod176 21:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep The guy appears to be a fairly well-known occultist. Article sure needs a lot of cleanup, though. NawlinWiki 21:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Per Nawlin. Although, are we sure this article isn't a copyvio?--NMajdan•talk 21:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• You mean like being lifted word-for-word from here? -- Fan-1967 21:31, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Written and posted by Greenfield himself, according to Talk:Allen Greenfield. --Celithemis 21:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Hence, a vanity post.Mod176 22:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Mod176 LactoseTI 23:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. article unreferenced. However as alternative: tidy and remove NPOV style and reference up Ohconfucius 03:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Subject is a published author, a Gnostic Bishop, and fairly well known in his field. -999 (Talk) 19:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

  Then someone else can write an article about him. This is an autobiographical entry (see WP:AUTO). Wiki is not for tooting your own horn. He already has a web page for that.Mod176 20:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup per 999. —Hanuman Das 13:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• KEEP ME - This article is about me. Much of it is, admittedly and candidly, too personal, from my publisher's web site, tracing back to my own organization's site, up on the nef for more than ten years. The Bibliography is something I wrote for the information of Wikipediareaders. It is entirely factual. For the record, a casual scan of Google or Amazon.com will show that I am a rather well-known and controversial author on occultism, UFOs and similar subjects. I have repeatedly asked associates to clean the piece up technically (I do not have the skill) and to revise it to include critical material from various points of view. It is not a "vanity" piece by any standard of self-promotion in any sense, though I am gratified that there is an entry about me, I think *an* entry is merited, and I myself am much in favor of including some critical study as well as a healthy clean-up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allengreenfield (talk • contribs)
• Keep - I have known Allen Greenfield personally for 13 or more years and I attest that the information in this article is accurate. That said, it is also a tad spun and needs to be cleaned up. I am looking into doing some edits. tau peristera 01:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - published author. Ekajati 16:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.