Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Headline News

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] All Headline News

Advertorial for a news service, scores around 130 unique Googles (headline news%22&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&start=130&sa=N) offers no evidence of meetin WP:CORP or WP:WEB. Article has lots and lots of links into the site, suggests possible SEO (but might just be plain old-fashioned spam). Just zis Guy you know? 12:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Keep - Keep in mind that it is itself a news source and a syndicator of content... you may want to rethink your methods.. Using your exact UK Google index Google.co.uk I get 476,000 entries. Looking for websites alone that link just to the home page there are over 900 entries (http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=link:1vCZqn5vnOUJ:www.allheadlinenews.com/) Using the "GOOGLE" tests you'll see that news.google.com lists them as a source..... Besides the company is fairly well known in the news industry. If using WP:CORP as the measuring stick then (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22All+headline+news%22+-allheadlinenews.com) and (http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr=&q=%22All%20headline%20news%22%20-allheadlinenews.com&sa=N&tab=wn) show that other news sources regularly attribe news to AHN. The site is referenced bu sourcewatch (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=All_Headline_News) and others.... if using WP:WEB then http://southflorida.bizjournals.com/southflorida/event/1615 may apply or certainly google itself (http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22all+headline+news%22) Talk To Eventus

I DO NOT agree with user JZG and I think he got it wrong.. this article should remain. -Martin

• genuine news website, but info on page looks spammy, witness all the blue links to different parts of AHN website. delete or cleanup. Ohconfucius 07:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 11:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 11:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. Those who wish to make a case that this is notable should do so in the article, not here. Septentrionalis 13:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Jon Cates 13:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, but here, or the article talk page, is the place for making cases, not in the article itself. Tonywalton  | Talk 13:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nom. —Xyrael 14:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.