Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Headline News (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mangojuice^talk 18:19, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] All Headline News

Previously deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Headline News, this is a somewhat different article although with a couple of sentences which look hauntingly familiar (probably the result of both this and the deleted article being largely the work of single purpose account Eventus (talk · contribs), another person who likes blkanking his Talk page. This article was created by Newsjunky (talk · contribs), that account's sole contribution. I would just nuke it but it is not formally a speedy-repost (rather less spammy this time round) and there was some evidence that at least one historied editor thought there might be the germ of an encyclopaedic topic here. Guy 12:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:CORP. And, they're being obnoxious. My Alt Account 13:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Unless this is suddenly notable. :) Dlohcierekim 20:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Give the article a chance to mature and prove iteself.... This news agency is just as important as any listed on Category:News agencies or Category:News agency and does fit WP:CORP as it's listed and referenced by several news industry watchdog groups (Sourcewatch among others) It's also has been referenced as a prominent news agency in other Wikipedia articles. :) NewsJunky
• Weak keep but cleanup. Is this the same All Headline News that used to have a TV news operation? If so, it might meet notability just as a bit of history. --Aaron 00:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment The issue is not so much the state of the arivle as the subject's lack of notability. Perhaps it is not so prominent as it would like. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 02:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Even their press page doesn't persuade me they've crossed the WP:CORP hurdle. Good luck to them getting there, but I don't see it yet. William Pietri 00:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, advertising. Andjam 11:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - notable. --Irishpunktom\^talk 16:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Needs expansion and cleanup though, is notable(weak) Eventus 17:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
  • This user has only made edits relating to All Headline News. Andjam 00:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
    • And to several other categories and articles relating to news. Eventus 15:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - It is as notable as many others that I have seen in the category.. Don't delete it, build on it 70.222.114.176 18:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Only edit by 70.222.114.176 Andjam 00:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.