Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AllOfMP3.com legality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was effectively delete. This should be a redirect to the main article, really... not an article itself. Doing so also preserves the edit history if anyone wants to merge content. W.marsh 17:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AllOfMP3.com legality
Unencyclopedic, original research. The article is a rundown of laws and legal rulings (unencyclopedic), along with commentary discussion by an editor about whether or not these laws and rulings would apply to the site it is discussing (original research). The AllOfMP3.com has information on the site's legal status already. I don't know why the template above is broken or how to fix it, I'm sorry. Brad T. Cordeiro 22:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- I found the proeblem with the template. You don't need to type in subest when you are crating the template. --70.48.175.99 22:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Beat me to the punch, but yeah, that was the basic problem. I've redone it again to categorize the AfD into the "Web" category. -- Y|yukichigai (ramble argue check) 22:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - no reason for legality to have it's own article, I agree. Plymouths 22:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator. Luke! 23:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - AllOfMP3.com originally had a large section on the legality in various countries. This is an important and rather controversial topic as a part of the original AllOfMP3.com article, but it got so large it was moved to a separate article. Discussion of AllOfMP3.com's legality is certainly warranted, however as it stands now the United States section of the article is original research, non-neutral, and written in impenetrable legalese by a single anonymous editor. Suggest trim and merge back into AllOfMP3.com.--TexasDex 00:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nominator - Shaundakulbara 04:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Smerge - Main article should discuss this, but not a lot. This company is a legitimate company selling a legitimate product. Speculating too much on legality is borderline libel. Gigs 22:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as probably WP:NOR. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 07:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, list is so long that it should be separated. -Lapinmies 10:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, This article is somewhat useful Mountpanorama 01:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - unless reliable third party sources are included. At the moment the entire article appears to be original research. Addhoc 16:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
