Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alissa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 22:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alissa
Porn star is not notable by any present criteria. Has neither won awards in her field nor have demonstrated any other noteworthy attributes that would make this article worthy of inclusion. Delete. Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 15:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete DJ Clayworth 15:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. PJM
- Keep, --Haham hanuka 20:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. 50 films [1]. --JJay 21:30, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Those "50 films" are all videos, says IMDB -- or maybe they showed Pirate Fetish Machine: Secret Delights of Baroness Kinky at Cannes? --Calton | Talk 01:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Highly possible since porn in all its permutations is a big part of MIPCOM held every year at...Cannes. --JJay 01:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- By "Cannes", I am, of course, referring to the Cannes Film Festival, which MIPCOM (movie/TV trade show) is not -- any more so than the Association of Pakistanian Physicians of North America is the same as the American Seed Trade Association merely because they're both holding conventions in the same place at the same time (early July at the Chicago Hyatt Hotel). But I suspect you knew that already, but was hoping no one else would. --Calton | Talk 01:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strangely enough, that pretentious, annual, champagne-charged Cote d'Azur conclave, a stomping ground for film fetishists and their fawning, Godard-spouting followers, Le Festival de Cannes, has not yet been included in the Porn Bio essay criteria...So I guess what I already suspected (but naturally I wanted to assume good faith by striving to find a scintilla of a shred of a shadow of an iota of relevance in your remark) is that your original question was utterly extraneous to judging the porn industry and the noteworthy attributes of its video-prancing participants. --JJay 02:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- By "Cannes", I am, of course, referring to the Cannes Film Festival, which MIPCOM (movie/TV trade show) is not -- any more so than the Association of Pakistanian Physicians of North America is the same as the American Seed Trade Association merely because they're both holding conventions in the same place at the same time (early July at the Chicago Hyatt Hotel). But I suspect you knew that already, but was hoping no one else would. --Calton | Talk 01:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Just another porn "star". --Calton | Talk 01:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. based on WP:PORN BIO criteria. — RJH (talk) 18:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. 50 "films"? Gosh, I bet it took a whole week to shoot them. Denni ☯ 19:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Reyk YO! 00:33, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per JJay. Grue 14:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. 50 films is nothing by porn standards, especially not direct-to-video fapfuel like "Private Superfuckers 10: Nonstopsex" Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
