Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Angel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 05:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alison Angel

While there is no deying that a google search yeild lots of hits, in looking through the first ten pages I was unable to find anything more notable than babe-a-licious - Big Boob Blonde Alison Angel Sheds Her Blue Robe. Unless sources can be found per WP:CITE and Wikipedia:Reliable sources that demonstrate that this satisfies WP:WEB, I recomend deletion. brenneman^(t)(c) 17:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. Movementarian (Talk) 17:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. CalJW 20:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete advertising Abstrakt 21:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Massive internet exposure clearly demonstrates her accomplishments. -- JJay 22:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  • To be explicit: You are saying that we should reject the guideline? - brenneman^(t)(c) 22:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  • What guideline? Please be specific. -- JJay 22:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Umm, the one that I reference in the nomination? Since this person is operating under a pseudonym, and this "persona" only exists on the web sites, this is an article about websites.
    • If you aren't familiar with the guidelines for inclusion, I do apologise. I'd have thought that you'd have read the nomination, checked my homework, and clicked through the links I provided to see what it was I was on about. - brenneman^(t)(c) 00:07, 10 January 2006
    • Looks to me like the bio of a model. Not sure why you think this is about a website. -- JJay 00:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
      • All right then, what films has she been in? What magazines? When was shown on television? When did she get paid to dress up as a video game character and point fake weapons at adolescents? What's her birthday? Where was she born? Is she married? This is, for every purpose that matters to us, about the website. If it's about the model, it gets deleted even faster becuase there is nothing even remotely WP:Verifiable about her. - brenneman^(t)(c) 05:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Eusebeus 23:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as notable as any other Porn actress/model we've kept. Jcuk 23:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteNon notable. She is in fact less notable than the actresses and models we have kept, since she is not a movie star like most of the models. As a model, there is no claim to notability. The web site linked is not notable per nom.Obina 01:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Very weak delete. An adult model, whose own website and its teaser pages recently have become commonly seen on lists of such things. Not yet especially notable compared to dozens of others on the Internet. I don't think she's gone into movies (beyond self-produced solo) where notability would be easier to establish. Consensus (but not unanimity) on these pages has been that Internet nude models get higher number of hits than other public figures, partially due to search-engine optimization by porn webmasters; and that therefore they should have to reach a higher bar of notability as measured by online data such as the "Google test". Barno 01:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as spam -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and thanks for the link! Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 10:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.