Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliens From Hell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aliens From Hell

Tried to speedy this one but somebody kept deleting the tag. So I will try it this way. This is non-notable, and possibly a hoax. Delete Bombycil 20:12, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

  • keep. I think it's worth expanding- I am not sure if it is a hoax. Your speedy tag was removed because the article is not a candidate for speedy deletion.--Adam (talk) 20:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This may be true. But this article is original research. The collection of SciFi links may support this theory. WP:NORBut that is not for us to debate. What is needed is an source for this theory.Obina 20:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Definitely original research, and despite that, the concept is far too vague. How was Voyager's Species 8742 "From Hell"? Seems more like a commentary term from television without pity or something. --DDG 20:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Worl, I can see the idea; aliens from some Hellish otherworld, even if it's not necessarily Hell itself. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 01:23, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOR, as noted above. PJM 20:57, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOR, with a little bit of WP:SNOW with regards to the removal of the speedy tag -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 21:08, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - original research. Sounds like a topic for paper in an English class on contemporary literature. —ERcheck @ 00:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete neologism, unverifiable google. Derex 01:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, it is indeed original research. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 01:23, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.