Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia St. John

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alicia St. John

Alicia St. John (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Comment Minimal GHits. Virtually no news coverage[1].Stellatomailing 14:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - claims notability with multiple exhibitions, but sources are needed - Tiswas^(t) 15:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment The exhibitions are trade shows and/or non-notable.Stellatomailing 15:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete The degrees are in doubt, too, with the way this is written, presuming it is written by the subject. Established artists have exhibitions which show up readily in on-line google searches--gallery owners and museums know how to do this. KP Botany 20:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable, no references. Turgidson 01:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 18:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - looks NN to me, just a self-advert. Peterkingiron 23:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per KP Botany and Stellatomailing. Freshacconci 13:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.