Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Rhodes (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Veinor (talk to me) 13:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Alicia Rhodes
Not notable. Doesn't satisfy WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Keep - I think her two TV talk show appearances prove her notability. She is also possibly the top British female pornstar at the moment. Epbr123 19:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Although it's a disputed notability test, she has almost double the number of films that is suggested as being notable (i.e. 100). As well as at least three television appearances. Dismas|(talk) 20:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Her television appearances should be included in the article. Epbr123 02:34, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - Has appeared in lots of movies, but there's apparently nothing being written about her (no WP:RS cited), so verifiability of anything other than the filmography is unlikely... Valrith 21:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. Tabercil 22:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per nom. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 15:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per nom. I'd speedy close this one as "nomination withdrawn", but there is a weak delete opinion up there, so it'll have to run the course. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 18:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
