Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia 36jj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alicia 36jj

Apparently non-notable porn model, looks like an advertisement. Said to have started modeling in Dec 05 (was Mar 06 in the version I PRODded, then backdated by the author). You, the community, be the judge of whether the volume of her mammaries alone is sufficient to establish notability, but I rather doubt it. Sandstein 17:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable nude model. Per the article, she's been modeling for four months (or one, depending on which revision you're reading) on one site which doesn't meet WP:WEB (Alexa of 137,683 is pretty low for an original adult site). Doesn't cut the WP:BIO mustard for me. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Too much of one good thing and not enough of the other. --Fuhghettaboutit 18:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. (It may take a lot of deleting.) Wikipedia is WP:NOT an index of non-notable porn stars.
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 00:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable per above.--Blue520 08:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unless free subs to divinebreasts.com are offered for keep votes Deizio 16:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nonnotable -- Google lists only 526 pages. tregoweth 16:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.