Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Staton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ali Staton

Ali Staton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This article fails to show how this person meets the notability standard of WP:BIO/WP:MUSIC. One hit in Google news. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete I couldn't find any assertation of notability either -- nothing that proves he's worked with the artists listed. Even if he has, that doesn't mean he's automatically notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC/WP:BIO. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No assertion of notability. Even if he has worked with other notable artists, that doesn't make him notable himself. He still needs objective independent coverage. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 05:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Celarnor's response, working with notable artists does not satisfy WP:MUSIC. WilliamH (talk) 20:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable. Google news reveals nothing. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 22:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unable to justify this under WP:MUSIC criteria JBsupreme (talk) 17:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.