Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Airhawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 15:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alfred Airhawk

Alfred Airhawk (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable character with practically NO SOURCES on the page. Should be merged or article should not exist at all. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroGiga (talk • contribs) 21:30, 10 December 2007

• Comment Merged to... where? ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 20:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck (talk) 18:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 11:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no real-world relevance, notability, sources or significance. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I would vote merge into Fatal Fury, but this character doesn't even seem notable enough to be mentioned in the Characters section of that page. --NickPenguin_(contribs) 18:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete then re-create as redirect → Fatal Fury#Introduced in Real Bout Fatal Fury Special: Dominated Mind, tagging the redirect with {{R to list entry}} and removing the wikilink that appears in the target section, leaving an editorial comment (<!-- -->) referring to this AFD; I often add such comments and would if I were closing this AFD. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Article is written in-universe, and has no secondary sources to establish notability per Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Pagrashtak 16:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.