Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alforce Veedramon

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Keep 2 / Delete 8 / Merge 1 / Merge else Delete (1) -- AllyUnion (talk) 11:23, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Alforce Veedramon

Fancruft, not that notable. Luigi30 03:29, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Is there any way to be sure this is Fancruft and not a real (whatever that means) Digimon? (I'm surprised there are only 174 entries in category:digimon. Who'd have thought they'd be that popular a subject?) RJFJR 04:48, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
  • "Fancruft" != "not real". Bearcat 21:07, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Going by Veemon it seems to be "real" in terms of being an actual digimon. Unless we delete the entire Category:Digimon this needs to be a Keep--ZayZayEM 08:33, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Good idea. --BM 23:22, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The multitudes of Pokemon articles are annoying anyway, we don't need more Digimon articles. ugen64 03:41, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable - less than 22 hits on Google, minor fictious Digimon character. Megan1967 04:00, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, My eyes! My eyes! Inter 11:19, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep there is such a Digimon & most info about is is legit as Veemon was said in bandai to have the potential to be a Veedramon.
  • Vote by anon user 68.200.81.62. It doesn't count. --Neigel von Teighen 23:14, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, cruft. Wyss 22:15, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, it's a real Digimon & here's the site to prove it. http://shiningevo.ultimatedigimon.com/encyclopedia/digimon/alforce_vdramon.html
  • Vote by anon user 209.208.108.179. It doesn't count. --Neigel von Teighen 23:14, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Should we have an article for each Digimon/Pokémon??? --Neigel von Teighen 23:10, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep (in spite of the fact that I find all the digimon stubs irritating. I'd actually like it if all the forms of Veemon were rolled into one article and the names redirected to it, but I'm not currently willing to do the work myself, and there would be a lot of different digimons for this kind of merging to be done for). RJFJR 23:16, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
• For the reasons given in Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Machinedramon: Merge the lot, or failing that Delete. Uncle G 02:43, 2005 Feb 6 (UTC)
• Delete. We delete top professors, but want to keep every single Digimon there is? We should have one article on Digimon, and that's it, the rest is pointless - they have no relevence, influence or importance outside of Digimon. Average Earthman 11:50, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. All of these Digimon character articles should go. See my comments on Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Machinedramon. --BMdramon 23:19, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Bart133 (t) 02:24, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:26, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Veemon. We may not like, it but both Pokemon and Digimon have a real impact on children, we can't just delete them all. They are notable whether we like it or not. Mgm|^(talk) 13:04, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.