Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfa Romeo 33 Carabo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Guest9999 (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Alfa Romeo 33 Carabo

Alfa Romeo 33 Carabo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Can you really belive this article? No, if you don't have sources, proof and/or evidence. The author of this article maybe think we are gullable Hellboy2hell (talk) 08:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

*Comment - Not sure if it needs its own page but the details appear authentic [1] - should it maybe just have a request for references instead?-Hunting dog (talk) 09:42, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep - After making the comment - realised the page was added for deletion about 3 mins after it was created! Think author needs more time possibly and some friendly help not this -Hunting dog (talk) 10:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - another deletion nomination without even Googling for the topic, which quite definitely exists. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 10:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Having looked a little further - this is a very notable concept car of the period, very influential on future designs, and (because of its exotic looks) quite well-known. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 10:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep notable concept car for the period. Have added a couple of ext. links to pages that talk about it. KTC (talk) 10:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep notable car, article has WP:RS. 3 minutes after the article was created!!!!! C'mon, how about helping a guy out instead of AfDing it.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 12:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep definitely notable, plenty of sources available. Article can meet notability and verifiability standards. EJF (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Meets WP:N and there are enough sources to expand the article. --Cameron (T|C) 13:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.