Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Zaitchik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alexander Zaitchik

Alexander Zaitchik (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Prodded. `'mikkanarxi 22:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

• I've completed this nomination by adding the correct template to the actual page. This was prodded (a few times) by HereToHelp (talk • contribs) and Cranor (talk • contribs) as "Alexander Zaitchik is not nearly notable enough for his own entry. Additionally there are a lack of secondary sources about him." I have no opinion at this time. - 152.91.9.144 23:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

delete per subjects apparent wishes Talk:Alexander Zaitchik, tho how do we substantiate that, shld he email someone? (pls note i'm acctually 'left-wing' - & i mean that, i'm not frm the u s so i know that the term doesn't simply mean "not a rabid fascist/imperialist" - i simply support this persons right to privacy, it is after-all a, current, vandal- and, potential, libel magnet)  ⇒ bsnowball  14:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete With all due respect to the subject and his feelings, his wishes shouldn't impact our decision of whether to keep or delete an article. Even a former foundation board member couldn't get her article deleted with that rationale. That said, there's no clear assertion to notability, and he's already mentioned at New York Press (though with a different title). Delete--Kchase T 18:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Seems like there are very few sources of info which can be used for this. WP:OR must be a consideration. Inner Earth 21:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I don't really see a reason for the actual guy deleting his wiki article... I mean in effect the article had enough problems already -- why not just ask for deletion yourself and as you aren't a former wiki board member... easily pass deletion? Nevertheless... he fails. sorry dude. DELETE! MrMacMan 09:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.