Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Waugh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 07:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alexander Waugh

A page on an individual of questionable notability - he might pass the test, but others need a look. Also, the author of the article is one User:Awaugh. You can do the math. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 10:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Alexander Waugh features on this [BBC Webpage]. Appears he is notable enough for inclusion, although the article does need a lot of cleanup. Wikipeterproject 11:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep something there but unless all that red link (or should I say red ink?) disappears and the sources and cites are worked on we will have this discussion again within a month Alf photoman 15:27, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I reckon he's notable enough, and even the auto-bio (although bad) shouldn't be terminal as all the information should be able to be verified. Madmedea 22:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Pretty well known journalist in UK (beyond his parentage), and bibliography definitely notable enough for inclusion. Needs a rewrite, though. And a bit of shame about the author: At least Ildan Mehmet Murat Ildan pretends it's someone else...Scandrett00:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
• keep The notability is obvious from the article's listing of positions and writings. Its reasonable nonCOI for an autobio--we've seen much worse. DGG 03:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.