Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Heilbrunn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kilo-Lima|(talk) 15:50, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alexander Heilbrunn

Non-notable "art director and musician". Fails WP:MUSIC, fails to specify what albums he was art director for, and gets 8 Googles hits. Was prodded, but tag removed. Calton | Talk 05:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Refactored Comment: This is a new article from what I can tell and, therefore, it is still in progress since information is gathered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.42.202 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 14 April 2006
Information is still being gathered. {{Unsigned|68.9.42.202| 21:55, 14
Some art directions projects have been added to WikiPedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.42.202 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 14 April 2006
This article falls under the fowllowing criteria for Notable musicians:
Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (or both, as in British hip hop); note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.42.202 (talk • contribs) 17:29, 15 April 2006
It has been clarified that this article does in fact meet WP:Music criteria, which could avoid deletion. Please post if any additional information and sources are needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.42.202 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 15 April 2006 and previous
Alex was a major part of the Boston music scene when he lived in Boston. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.42.202 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 19 April 2006
Such a major part that he managed to escape attention entirely. Why would that be? Or do you have evidence to the contrary? --Calton | Talk 23:42, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't think that all "evidence" exists online so it's difficult to make that sort of a judgement in regards to an article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.232.53 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 21 April 2006
And since the evidence of Heilbrunn's very existence is paltry and you haven't provided a shred of proof otherwise, I'd say it's very easy to make that sort of a judgement in regards to an article failing WP:VERIFY by such a wide margin.
  • Comment: No, it has not been "clarified", since you neither specify what it is he is a representative of, nor provide the slightest proof that it is true. And would you mind explaining how a "prominent representative" of any noteworthy musical style only manages 5 Google hits? That's not very prominent. --Calton | Talk 00:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.