Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexa Davis

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 09:48, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Alexa Davis

Was nominated as a speedy, but doesn't fulfill the criteria. An adoration article, if there is such a thing. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 21:44, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. That's so cute... but not encyclopedic. Zzyzx11 | Talk 21:47, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete of course. But can we see a picture first? ---Isaac R 21:58, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete if possible (see below) unless they provide a hot photo of her, in which case Very Strong Keep! Preferably in a red bathing suit please. Oh and with her hair down. I like that in a Playma--uh, girl. LOL! Master Thief Garrett 22:08, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Since a photo of Alexa isn't likely to be forthcoming, and since you seem so eager, I thought I would provide you with this. Dsmdgold 14:57, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
    • LOL! It's not nearly midnight any more y'know... LOL! Master Thief Garrett 21:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • If it is not a CSD, we could move the entry to BJAODN. --SuperDude 18:44, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Looking through the page history, it apparently was speedily deleted (as an aside, I added the speedy delete tag to it). R Calvete 22:33, 2005 Apr 24 (UTC)
  • Can we re-speedy it in that case?
    • No we can't speedy it, because it doesn't fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 13:11, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • As unnoteworthy Alexa Davis is (sorry Alexa!), she's probably more noteworthy than Cool bounce. --Isaac R
  • That's why we're deleting them both! Master Thief Garrett 11:54, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as vanity, and a unencyclopedic, nonsensical microstub. --SuperDude 04:36, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Vanity isn't a criterion for speedy deletion. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 13:11, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Sjakkalle 10:57, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity Dsmdgold 14:47, Apr 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Moronism Minirich
• For goodness' sake, be reasonable! This is a vanity article, and a stub with little or no meaning (from my point of view). May I cite § 2.1 in the Speedy criteria:

1. Very short articles with little or no context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great.")

This is a short article, isn't it? Speedy at once, and if you can't do this because it doesn't fit the criteria, then Delete As Fast As Possible. Rubbish like this article should not remain here for a long time. JMBell° 15:05, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• • This article won't last a long time. However, it does give context to a degree. While not being notable, it is not a speedy deletion candidate. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 16:54, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - sometimes love just ain't enough. Onlyemarie 15:11, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm sure the guy has had plenty of time by now to take a screenshot so he can show it off to his girlfriend. Maybe Wikipedia could charge for this service? It could generate a few bucks. ;-) 23skidoo 21:04, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I see it now... Wikiboy: e-Mansion... Master Thief Garrett 21:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Gentle Delete. This is funny, but it has to go. BJAODN anyone? Zscout370 22:44, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• I change my mind: Transwiki to the Comedy Wiki. Past BJAODN can be transferred there as well. --SuperDude 00:29, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 03:37, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete --nihil 22:03, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

As the creator of this blathering article, I'm going to note that I use wikipedia for everything in the world. I did this to show her the way in which wikipedia functions, since she plainly did not believe me. I was expecting it to be pulled down without much fanfare. Harassment can be addressed to dmk2113@columbia.edu.

With all due respect, if you do use Wiki so often you should know that tests belong in the sandbox; thanks. Onlyemarie 18:17, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete as user test based on the above note. Jonathunder 09:16, 2005 Apr 28 (UTC)
• Awwww. Delete. Secretcurse 01:57, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.