Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex hawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 19:36, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Alex hawk

Tagged as nn-bio, but I'm not sure that isn't at least an assertion of note. (It was me that munged the link, btw.) -Splash^talk 02:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: Fails Geogre's Law (any article with a miniscule surname already has serious problems). I agree that it's not a speedy, but that's all. The article advertises a writer of smutty stories and has unverifiable (not just unverified) claims of praise from "all over the internet community" (another capitalization error there, BTW). Further, the article concerns not an author, but a screen name. There is no person there, only a fiction that writes fictions. Geogre 03:25, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Certainly not nn-bio - the claims are there, but definitely fails to meet WP:BIO. PJM 03:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as above. His stories "tend to be characterized by intricate plots, intelligent, witty dialogue, semi-realistic scenarios, well-developed characters and (occasionally quite lengthy), author's notes"? Good grief. Andrew Levine 04:27, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete after viewing (and unmangling) the link to his web page, I noticed that he has only a handful of articles, and has no reference to being published. If he is an unpublished author, therefore he is not notable. His web page is not sufficiently popular to make it notable in its own right. 203.122.225.241 13:36, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

According to Wiki policy, if an assertion of signifcance is clearly made in a biographical article, as in this case, it is not eligible for speedy deletion. It should then be examined by editors via the VFD process to see if its claims of notability are valid. If not, it gets deleted. PJM 13:55, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Okay, so Strong Delete then. 203.122.225.241 15:54, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Preaky 07:01, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.