This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 15:30, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable neologism. --Tabor 20:17, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Strong delete - It is literally not worth the calories that my fingers would expend to type out in full the many and obvious reasons that this article deserves deletion. Schmeitgeist 22:46, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
Delete - Is this even a word? Even if it was a word, it doesn't look like it could be expanded into a wikipedia article, or even a stub. If its a word, wiktionary it. --Phroziac 22:50, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.