Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Hammond, Jr.'s second album

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 06:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Albert Hammond, Jr.'s second album

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Albert Hammond, Jr.'s second album
Albert Hammond, Jr.'s second album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No original research, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Will (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment No one knows the exact title for Wipeout PS3 either but it still has its own article.
  • Keep, many albums have these pages before they have titles, and are used for fans to keep up on the album's status. Also, there is no "crystal-balling" on the pages. The songs that have been confirmed for the album are confirmed in interviews by Albert himself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laynethebangs (talk • contribs) 22:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment The sources that do exist aren't very reliable; many are YouTube links and the rest don't appear reliable. Even if the artist has verified tracks, there is still too much crystal balling going on. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment the other sources are Rolling Stone Magazine, a major publication, Pitchfork Media one of the leading sources of internet music journalism, and NME, the leading british music magazine. These sources make up a majority of the sources used in the article (I believe they are 4/6 of the sources) so "many" of them aren't youtube and if you don't believe or have never heard of the others that doesn't make them "unreliable," they are major publications in the world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laynethebangs (talk • contribs) 02:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep but get rid of Possible Tracks section, as that is complete speculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.217.222 (talk) 03:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep The article has potential, but I fear it does boarder on WP:Crystal. Canyouhearmenow 02:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.