Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alastair Santhouse

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 10:54, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Alastair Santhouse

This applies to both Santhouse and Alastair Santhouse. I don't see enough evidence of notability. Smacks of self-promotion. --MarkSweep 22:59, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete self promotion/vanity... Nashikawa 23:23, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, could be vanity, CVish... Wyss 00:21, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- both. Vanity. - Longhair | Talk 09:43, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Keep if the publications are indeed notable, if not, delete SusanaeIII

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.