Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alastair Donaldson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Concensus. Davewild (talk) 12:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alastair Donaldson

Alastair Donaldson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

notability not established with any sources Arx Fortis (talk) 02:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Notability is well asserted through membership in multiple notable bands. Unless the notability of said bands or the truthfulness of this article is suspect, lack of sources is not a valid reason to delete. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: I cannot find any reliable sources, and there are none in the article. This person does not seem to meet WP:MUSIC, specifically this section of the guideline. So unless some sources to verify this notability can be dug up, I say delete. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Sources were fairly easy to find and have been added to the article.--Michig (talk) 08:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
• Merge Sources are plentiful, but shouldn't this content be on parent article. scope_creep (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with his main band, but watch for weasel words. —ScouterSig 22:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

GJH: Please be careful with your edits, as you deleted my vote. —ScouterSig 21:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep This musician is considered highly influential in the later pop and punk genres. He has had a significant recorded output, and all of his major bands are listed on Wikpedia (Rezillos, Silly Wizard, Revillos etc). gjhdiver 14:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or merge to Revillos. All the references in this article are to trivial or incidental coverage of him. If he is as influential as some here claim, why is there no substantial coverage of him? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The sources in the article are enough to establish notability for mine. Capitalistroadster (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.