The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g1, nonsense protologism, unsourced. NawlinWiki 14:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
2 google hits, both use the term but don't define it and it's not clear from the context what the meaning is. This is an non-notableunverifiableprotologism that should be deleted. Prod removed by anon-IP. Aagtbdfoua 13:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Strong delete, per WP:NFT and per all the unverifiable "sexual acts" we've deleted in the past. Demiurge 14:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.