Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alarm magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Anas ^talk? 21:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alarm magazine

Alarm magazine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No claim of notability, no references. Is every minor magazine notable?  _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  22:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 22:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep seems notable enough (do a google run), but it's not really wikified. Tagged it. SalaSkan 17:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 15:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, appears notable per Ghits: [1]. Bearian 21:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

• Would you stop voting according to the ghits argument? The Evil Spartan 14:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Not every magazine is notable (?), but this one certainly seems to be. —Xezbeth 08:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.