Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Rewitzer (cocktail)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 05:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Alan Rewitzer (cocktail)

Alan Rewitzer (cocktail) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Probably should be speedied, but it doesn't fit neatly into any of the speedy categories. Assuming this is even real, it's completely non-notable. Google search for "Alan Rewitzer" returns several results; add in "cocktail" and that drops off to only 3 (none of which have to do with this drink). Gromlakh (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. You're right, this doesn't fit a speedy criteria. Probably could have used a prod, but the end result is the same. Pastordavid (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - I'm not a big fan of prod. The last several times I've used it, the original authors of the articles have just deleted it without explanation. I've found the AfD route also offers a better chance of a snowball delete, which this is probably headed towards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gromlakh (talk • contribs) 21:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as non notable even if could be documented somewhere. I usually try prod, it works at least half the time; cutting down the number of afds in half would be a great improvement. DGG (talk) 16:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete agree with all above. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.