This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was COPYVIO. This VfD was therefore moot and nothing prevents a non-copyvio version of the article from being posted. Postdlf 10:34, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Article is an advertisment. Linuxbeak 22:34, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
Copyvio from [1] and tagged as such. However, the company itself is notable, so if somebody wants to write a real version at the temp page, I would vote keep. Meelar(talk) 23:13, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
Keep -- with a rewrite of course. - Longhair | Talk 06:51, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.