Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akilam Two

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect to Akilattirattu Ammanai following a merge. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:27 (UTC)

[edit] Akilam Two, Akilam Three, Akilam Four, Akilam Five

See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Akilam One. None of these articles provide any context, none of the titles are known to Google. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete: No guru, no method. No article in any of these. All are speedy candidates under criterion #1. Geogre 14:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge into Akilattirattu Ammanai. Same applies for the subsequent number permutations of this. Wikibofh 14:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge as above. Kappa 20:50, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all, these are almost speedy candidates due to lack of content and context, agree with George. JamesBurns 00:54, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge, unless it can be demonstrated that there is enough content for these pages to be more than stubs. - SimonP July 1, 2005 20:41 (UTC)
    • Please change your vote with regards to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matthew 1, and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matthew 1:verses, your opinion here is not consistent. ~~~~ 1 July 2005 21:54 (UTC)
      • What do you mean? Those pages are clearly not stubs. - SimonP July 1, 2005 21:58 (UTC)
        • When you take away the "full text", image, and introductory fluff (the increadibly obvious matthew 1:9 is the 9th verse of the 1st chapter of the book of matthew, and the text describes part of the genealogy of jesus - extremely obvious because the text is and he begat X, who begat Y, who begat Z), most are little more than stubs. ~~~~ 2 July 2005 10:09 (UTC)
          • Even with all of that removed Matthew 1:9 is still longer than all of the articles listed here. It is also duplicitous to cite the shortest of 107 articles as a standard example. - SimonP July 2, 2005 15:28 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.