Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisplb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep and move to AISPLB. howcheng {chat} 17:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Aisplb

Spam article on obscure legal organization which reads like a site. Mecanismo | Talk 23:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and Expand. -- JJay 18:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment why? --Mecanismo | Talk 23:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Looks important. -- JJay 01:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• I believe that a "look" doesn't constitute much of an evidence of factual information. An encyclopedia should be a vehicle of factual information and notable subject. If the only proof of the veracity or notability of a subject is the "look" and there is no factual information to coroborate that, then obviously the subject isn't worthy of an encyclopedia article --Mecanismo | Talk 13:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• Please try to give valid reasons when nominating on AfD. If you are not going to attempt to justify the case for deletion, I default to Keep. -- JJay 18:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• Did you failed to read the AFD reason I stated above? I noticed you have a habit of casting mindless votes to some submittions without stating any reason. If you defend the need of give valid reasons, why don't you apply that principle to all your votes and submittions? --Mecanismo | Talk 23:19, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• Look, it's your nom. It's up to you to explain why a Shia legal organization that is apparently the only one of its kind in India, with news coverage, etc should be deleted. If you have reasons for that please state them. You should know, however, that I do not believe we should be throwing out valuable information. Changing my vote now to Keep and Expand. -- JJay 23:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Relisting this to generate more discussion. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 22:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, cleanup and expand, and move to full name of organization. This gets a number of hits on Google News. I am sure there must have been news in other languages than English as well. u p p l a n d 19:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I've added five more external links. This has gotten international coverage including The American Muslim and the BBC. I wonder whether the nominator researched this before putting it up for deletion. Durova 19:56, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. If kept, the article should be moved to AISPLB. — JIP | Talk 20:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advert. Stifle 01:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.