Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisleyne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete for failing WP:BIO.. Shell ^babelfish 01:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Aisleyne

Nominated for the fact no reliable sources that detail the notability or history of the item, so fails the verifiability standard. As well for the fact it fails to meet WP:BIO. Also, the original result for the original AfD was redirect, therefore the article creator Rishko has therefore got around this and created another article without the surname. Dr Tobias Funke 21:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep for now per this search --Addhoc 22:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, this search relates to events within the Big Brother house in 2006 and nothing else outside it. Dr Tobias Funke 22:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This does not appear to meet notability as a bio. The disjointed account of the Big Brother thing could be cleaned up and shortened if the article ends up being kept this time. --Stormbay 22:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or at least move to an appropriate title. — Xy7 16:39, 15 July 2007
• keep - She's a meaningless pop personality, but she has appeared in TV, radio and magazines. Can someone please explain how she fails notability? I'd love to vote delete, because I personally feel transient media personalities are not notable and not worthy of inclusion; however, I've not seen any Wikipedia rule (or interpretation of one) to justify my position. Please help me!!! AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 19:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - AllGloryToTheHypnotoad, refer to WP:BIO, Not notable
• Keep - Notable, as regularly appearing on television, radio and in newspapers/magazines. Also, a regular contributor to two high-circulation magazines. Mentioned in many other Wikipedia entries (mainly TV show listings), which have now been linked to. Daringo 00:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - the appearance on television does not equate to notability; in this instance it seems like trivia. There is no impact on society at large by this individual's presence on television. I would even label this type of article as fancruft; it serves no purpose except to a few. --Storm Rider ^(talk) 06:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete lots of people appear on TV regularly and aren't notable. Have people written or had TV programs about this person beyond the context of Big Brother? SamBC 19:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.