Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisha Goodison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 00:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Aisha Goodison

Not notable. Does not meet the WP:MUSIC guidlines. One self-published album, released a year ago (plus a remix album, also self-published). Can't find any evidence of a national tour, significant venues, etc. -- even on her web site. Seven Google hits on "Aisha Goodison", all about the lawsuit, none about her music. Search on "singer Aisha" turns up a a couple references to the lawsuit, and a bunch of singers who are not her. No entry in allmusic.com for "Aisha Goodison". There is ab entry on an "Aisha", a reggae singer. Unless she's a reggae singer (doesn't look like it), that's probably not her; it's probably Aisha Davis. I found one one-sentence passing mention on a minor web site of a singer "Aisha"; that turned out to be Aisha Davis. The only possible claim to notability, I think, is that she has filed a nuisance lawsuit against Madonna, on what looks to be bizarre grounds, which I guess got a small amount of press notice. Anybody can do that. I don't think that comes close to making her notable. (If it does, I think the article should be rewritten to feature the lawsuit.) As a bonus, she (or a catspaw) created the article as vanity, then engaged in revert wars when editors NPOV'd it.Herostratus 07:40, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Much as I kinda regret the time I put into NPOVing it, I agree that she's non-notable and the article should go. Zora 07:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

I appreciate your good work on that, Zora. I've done the samy myself. I almost wanted to not nominate the article and waste your work, but I think this is better all around. Herostratus

• Delete as per nom. DeathThoreau 15:54, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete - I think the lawsuit, especially if it develops further, gives borderline notability and I wouldn't object much to the current stub version. Tearlach 18:11, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - bring it back if anything comes of the lawsuits or she gets on a label, otherwise non-notable - Dharmabum420 00:36, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per norm. Her editing of the article didn't helpSethie 16:43, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.