Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airpoints
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The topic probably passes WP:N, per AA, but the article does not cite a single source and therefore fails WP:V. Sandstein 22:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Airpoints
It appears to me that this article is in violation of WP:NOT#INFO, in addition to WP:V, as I can't find reliable, third party sources which give this FFP notability in an encyclopaedic context. It should be noted that the tendency is for airline articles to mention these FFP in the main article, rather than a stand alone 'travel guidish' article on programs which aren't notable on their own. Russavia 09:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as spam. Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EuroBonus (Google News).. → AA (talk) — 10:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletions. -- → AA (talk) — 11:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as spammy PR exercise. --Gavin Collins 13:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 13:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. There is no attempt to establish notability. Google hits are not notability. Vegaswikian 23:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
