Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airdisaster.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. —Cleared as filed. 03:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Airdisaster.com
- KEEP This website is life for many people, and the description is factual David Hilditch 05:17, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Non notable website - wikipedia as promotional tool Tagishsimon (talk) 05:16, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom --Tagishsimon (talk)
- Delete Forum members:2,311 Alexa Rating:53,258 doesn't meet 2 out of 3 on WP:WEB --Pboyd04 05:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Promotional. Daniel Case 05:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - http://www.avitop.com/aviation/avitop.asp - ranks no.4 for aviation sites. airliners.net has similar entry. POV seems to have been edited. Notable site Roddy69
- Keep top rated site user:210.211.217.182
- Delete, as per nom. (Note that Roddy69 also created Parlour talk and Parlour talker) -- 9cds(talk) 10:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- SGBailey 10:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep per roddy Sceptre(Talk) 13:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Pboyd04. *drew 05:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep If cleaned up and de-cruftified. Fairly popular site. FCYTravis 07:47, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, appears to be notable within the field of aviation, perhaps wider. Evil Eye 00:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
- keep: I'm in favour of creating some kind of technology-based filtering instead of deletion for non-notability-- Marvin147 10:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.